Getting Above Standard Tenant Improvements

Do you want great space that helps define your business and attract new clients? Is your company culture important to hiring and retaining top talent? If any of these statements resonate with you, then you cannot afford to accept standardized tenant improvements.

Above standard tenant improvements are typically any material used to improve your space that is above the common finishes the building owner utilizes . Usually the building owner has a list or book of all standard paint carpet, lighting and other flooring finishes that they are willing to provide to improve their space with. These may not showcase your businesses image, align with your company culture, or provide current/potential clients an idea of the caliber of your services. Many architectural firms, law firms and technology companies (just to name a few) need their space to make an impression on everyone who walks through their front doors. An architect uses their lobby to speak to their design capabilities, lawyers use this & other meeting areas to set the tone for their prowess and other businesses use their interior common areas to reinforce their brand & company values. 

Achieving a certain look and feel beyond what a landlord is offering typically comes at an additional cost of construction.  For example: building out 5,000 sf with building standard finishes may run $60/sf ($300,000); however, your company may want to add design elements to part or all of your space that will increase that number to $85/sf ($425,000). The $125,000 delta between these two numbers can be covered in the following ways.

1. Tenant pays for the difference: now most tenant rep brokers hate this as it isn’t ideal for companies without a large war chest. It consumes the tenant’s capital upfront and can typically be used better by the tenant to grow their business. In the event the tenant outgrows their space ahead of the natural lease expiration, they’ve sunk capital improving a space they didn’t use for the duration of their lease. 

2. Landlord amortization of the difference: this is the most common solution to a tenant improvement overage. The landlord factors the additional cost of the tenant improvements into the tenant’s rent over time. This keeps the tenant from paying for the improvements upfront but does raise their monthly/annual rent obligation. This can be accomplished as a $/psf rent increase or an annual percentage increase. Think of it as a loan on the difference from the landlord. Does the landlord make a return on this loan...of course. Does the tenant lose if they outgrow the space ahead of the lease expiration? Yes, but not as much as if they pay out of pocket for the improvement difference up front. 

3. Covering the difference through a loss in concessions: this is by far the most complicated and situation specific solution. If you have a savvy tenant representative, who knows your improvement costs will overrun a standard market landlord contribution; they will negotiate a robust rent abatement package, then reduce that once the improvement costs are known so that your rent cost/sf doesn’t increase dramatically. The drawback here is that most businesses use the rent abatement period to offset moving, furniture and other soft costs associated with new space. If those costs are minimal, this may be the best option for a business needing above standard tenant improvements. 

*Value Engineering: while not always strategy for covering the cost difference in negotiations, having a great project manager or construction team working with your business & tenant representative to cut construction costs after you’ve secured a certain $/sf in landlord supplied improvement funds can be to your benefit. Make sure your tenant representative negotiated a clause which allows your business to utilize any unused funds in the form of full or partial rent payments. 

If you need any help finding or negotiating on space, call us. We’re here to help. #findYOURspace

5 Leasing Tips We Can Learn From Dogs

The two most persistent beings in the universe have to be dogs and children. Why are these little cutthroats so good at getting what they want? Here’s a few take aways we can we apply to the commercial leasing process which should help your company get what it needs.

1. Explore all your options: Dogs will stick their nose in everything just to figure out if it’s edible. At the onset of facility negotiations, you need to enroll as many desirable locations as possible. You also need to ask for everything that would make a facility contract compliment your business plan. Be strategic in the structure of the financial terms and the amount of exposure so your business can thrive.

2. Be Persistent: Ever had a dog beg for snacks/your dinner/belly rubs/a walk and then give up after one rebuke? Me neither. So when you don’t get a positive initial response to your requested lease terms, ask again. You may need to modify the language a little but go for what your business needs until you get it.

3. Play Dead: With a little training, dogs will do this for a reward. Sometimes it’s necessary in lease negotiations to take a step back, act offended, and let a landlord think their negotiation strategy killed a deal. More often than not you’ll reap the reward.

4. Leave Nothing Left: Whether it’s treats or steak bones, dogs rarely leave anything unfinished. Real estate costs are usually the 2nd or 3rd most costly expense your business will incur. You owe it to yourself and your employees to mitigate the fixed costs and your exposure to additional charges in negotiations. Grind multiple locations down simultaneously and don’t leave money on the table. Use each site as leverage against one another. Push hard until there’s nothing left.

5. Trust Your Pack: Dogs are a pretty good judge of character, and in their pack (human or canine) everyone plays their role. You need professional service providers throughout the leasing process. An experienced tenant representation broker to guide you through site selection and negotiation, a project manager to assist with construction pricing, scheduling and vendor coordination, and an attorney to negotiate and review lease language. Not only can you leverage these professionals to create the best outcome, you can spend more time focusing on your core business while they work for you. Lone wolves don’t accomplish much, you need a pack.

 Jamal Brown is the CEO of The Ocean Company, an exclusive tenant representation firm with offices in San Diego, Orange County and Los Angeles focusing on the leasing and acquisition of commercial real estate.

Main: 858.356.2990 | E-mail: jbrown@theoceanco.com | social: @theoceancompany

Does a Modern Office Space Need a Kitchen/Break Room

Office space occupiers often wonder if creating a kitchen or break room within their workspace is necessary. Commercial Real Estate expert Jamal Brown breaks down the reasons why designing a kitchen or a break room as an additional meeting area within your office space may be the best solution. Finding a tenant representation broker that knows how to maximize your usable square footage and use your space to support the company culture is key. If you have any questions on our office space design recommendations, feel free to call us. The Ocean Company is a team of commercial lease and property acquisition specialists with offices in Los Angeles, Orange County and San Diego California.

Understanding 'Rentable' vs. 'Usable' Square Feet

All commercial buildings are not created equal. This is evident upon inspection of multiple factors; location, allocated parking, quality of construction, and amenities provided, just to name a few. But one of the most overlooked aspects of a building’s value to the tenant is the efficiency of that particular building when compared to another. This efficiency is in relation to the ratio of the space the tenant actually leases within their four walls (the usable square footage) and the amount of space attributed to all common areas of the building including the lobby, hallways, restrooms, common conference rooms, common kitchen areas, interior break areas, work out buildings, showers/lockers, phone and electrical rooms, and any other common use area that, when added to the usable square footage, makes up the rentable square footage.  This ratio is called the building “core factor” (also referred to as “load factor”, “loss factor”, or “add-on factor”). Landlords are ensured of receiving income on this common space so it is distributed to each tenant as an “add on” to their usable square footage that then totals the tenant’s rentable square footage and this is what the rent is based on.  The difference in a building’s efficiency and therefor the core factor can quickly offset a lower base rent per square foot that building may have over another.  Core factors can vary by as much as 10% to 15% and many times they are “artificial” as in, implemented by the landlord with no confirmation.  This becomes a marketing ploy, to offer a lower rent when, in reality, the end result is substantially more than other competing buildings with greater efficiency.  We find that in many cases tenants, who have existed under leases for many years, still don’t understand this issue today.

Buildings calculate all space that is constructed as gross square footage.  The standard of commercial property measurement (“BOMA”) then requires that all vertical penetrations (stairwells and elevator shafts) be deducted from the gross square footage and the remaining square footage is the rentable square footage. When a company negotiates a lease on commercial space, they are occupying the usable square footage which is the square footage within their four walls but paying for the rentable square footage, including their share of the common areas referenced above.

Understanding core factors translates directly to the bottom line. Since building costs are typically near the top of the expense list, the savings can be dramatic in comparison to other expenses. Pay attention to the core factor. The example below puts numbers to the story:

XYZ Company needs 30,000 square feet of usable space to operate their business and is evaluating two opportunities. Building A has a core factor of 19% (1.19) and Building B has a core factor of 11% (1.11). Both buildings are offering the same rental rate, say $2.00 per rentable square foot. In this scenario, XYZ Company has a choice of leasing 35,700 rentable square feet in Building A, at a monthly rent of $71,400, or leasing a more efficient 33,300 rentable square feet in Building B, at a monthly rent of $66,600 per month. Calculating the difference in XYZ Company’s rental costs, they will save $288,000 over a five year lease term if they locate in Building B for the same amount of usable square footage.

This is one of many pitfalls that can be costly if not known by companies leasing commercial space.  Don’t get caught paying more than you should.  Hire a broker to help you.  It doesn’t cost you a dime but the savings can be extraordinary.